|
THE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH
UCSF GUIDANCE ON RESEARCH TOPICS AND
ISSUES
HUMAN
GENE TRANSFER/RECOMBINANT DNA RESEARCH
(revised January 2006)
Brief Overview
Human Gene Transfer Research is defined
by federal regulations as “any deliberate transfer of recombinant DNA, or DNA or
RNA derived from recombinant DNA (technology), into human research
participants.” Special provisions are necessary for conducting
human gene transfer research at UCSF. Principal investigators (PIs)
must complete a process of multiple reviews and approvals at both
federal and local/institutional levels, as explained below.
Application to the following will be required:
- RAC – Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee
(NIH)
- FDA – Food and Drug Administration (DHHS)
- BSC – Biological Safety Committee (UCSF)
- CHR – Committee
on Human Research (UCSF)
This guidance is meant to assist the investigator in obtaining
all reviews needed as efficiently as possible.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines:
In undertaking any gene transfer study, PIs should first consult
Appendix
M of the NIH Guidelines, “Points to Consider in the Design and
Submission of Protocols for the Transfer of Recombinant DNA Molecules
into One or More Human Research Participants.”
IMPORTANT NOTE: These NIH guidelines apply to any research to
be conducted at or sponsored by an institution receiving support
for recombinant DNA research from NIH. Thus, they apply to all
UCSF PIs involved in such research.
Application at the Federal Level
Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC)
Review
The NIH Guidelines,
Appendix M, outlines the scope of acceptable gene transfer proposals
as well as specific review requirements and procedures of the Recombinant
DNA Advisory Committee (RAC), within the NIH
Office of Biotechnology Activities (OBA). RAC is a public advisory committee to the Director of NIH; its
members include physicians, scientists, medical ethicists, consumer
activists, and private citizens, as well as ex officio members
of the federal government such as the FDA and the Office of Human
Research Protection (OHRP).
The initial RAC review process will include a determination as
to whether the study presents characteristics that warrant public
RAC review and discussion. RAC may decide that the protocol does
not need further in-depth review at a public meeting. However,
FDA and local review will still be needed (see below).
Protocols and consent forms should be prepared in accord with
NIH
Guidelines, Appendix M, sections II-V. (Also see http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/rdna.htm regarding informed consent and RAC
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for more information).
IMPORTANT NOTE: RAC review must precede local/ institutional review.
Any recommendations resulting from the RAC review must be included
in the applications to the UCSF Biological Safety Committee (BSC)
and Committee on Human Research (CHR) (see below).
Who is responsible for the RAC/OBA submission?
For UCSF Investigator-initiated
(investigator-sponsor) studies (e.g., production of vectors for
human application is performed
by the UCSF investigator), the UCSF PI is responsible for the submission
of the relevant information on the proposed human gene transfer
research to OBA (see directly above).
For Sponsor-initiated studies (e.g.,
the production of vectors for human application is not performed
by the UCSF investigator),
the Sponsor must complete the RAC submission process and provide
the UCSF PI with the required Appendix M information for the UCSF
BSC and CHR reviews.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In both Investigator-initiated
and Sponsor-initiated studies, no participants may be enrolled
at an individual site
until the OBA has received the following information from the
site PI:
- Approval from the Institutional
Biosafety Committee (IBC)—BSC
at UCSF;
- Approval from the Institutional
Review Board (IRB)—CHR
at UCSF;
- CHR-approved informed consent document.
- Curriculum vitae of
the PI(s) (no more than two pages in biographical sketch
format); and
- NIH grant number(s) if appropriate.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Review
The
study sponsor or investigator-sponsor will also need to submit
an Investigational
New Drug (IND) application to the FDA (see UCSF Guidance
on Investigational New Drugs and Biologics). The IND number
will be required for final CHR approval.
Application at the Local (UCSF) Level
After the study sponsor or investigator-sponsor has sought initial
RAC review and IND approval from the FDA, the UCSF PI must apply
for institutional review of the gene transfer research.
Biological Safety Committee (BSC): The PI will need to obtain a Biological
Use Authorization (BUA).
Committee on Human Research (CHR): The
PI must also obtain approval
from the CHR and submit the Human
Gene Transfer / Recombinant
DNA Research Application Supplement.
Applications may be submitted simultaneously to the BSC and CHR
for parallel review (see BSC
review deadlines and CHR
meeting dates for schedules).
Coordination of Approvals
CHR and BSC: The CHR and BSC will coordinate resolution of any
concerns raised by either committee before issuing final authorization
and approval. A link will be maintained between the approved CHR
application and the BUA for the life of the study.
CHR and FDA: The CHR must receive the IND approval number (obtained
from the FDA) before final CHR approval is issued.
CHR, BSC and RAC: A copy of final RAC approval or exemption from
review letter should be provided by the PI to the CHR and BSC with
the initial application. The CHR will not review the application
without this letter.
Copies of UCSF CHR and BSC approvals should be provided by the
investigator to OBA unless the study is sponsor-initiated, in which
case the PI should provide this information to the sponsor for
submission to OBA.
Reporting Adverse Events for Human Gene Transfer
Studies
Should an adverse event occur within a gene transfer study, the
following applies:
- The UCSF PI must consult and follow
policies and procedures for reporting adverse events to the
CHR and the BSC (see UCSF Adverse
Event Reporting Guidelines for information and forms).
- PIs at all sites must report qualifying
serious adverse events (SAEs) to the OBA according to the
guidance provided in
Appendix
M-I-C-3 and M-I-C-4 of the NIH Guidelines. PIs may
delegate this task to another party (e.g., the sponsor), provided
a letter
of delegation signed by the PI is on file with the OBA. In
either case, any OBA reports concerning UCSF-enrolled participants
should
also be submitted to the CHR and BSC.
- If the study IND is held by a
UCSF investigator (investigator-sponsor), the PI must also
report
qualifying SAEs directly to the FDA (see
21
CFR 312.32); if the study IND is held by an outside sponsor
(sponsor-initiated), this responsibility falls to the sponsor.
|